Re: [lojban] registry of experimental cmavo

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la lojbab cusku di'e

> > >2. bridi-to-sumti converter
> >
> >Would something in selma'o LU do it? It could take more than a
> >bridi, but I often find that I want to put more than a bridi
> >inside a du'u.
>
> You can do that now:  la'elu ...li'u

Yes, except maybe for some possible scrambling of deixis.

> >I can't think of a context where {le ge broda gi brode} would
> >cause ambiguity. If it doesn't, I don't see why it should not
> >be allowed.
>
> The ambiguity is that anything that is a sumti-tail is also a full sentence
> (observative), and we have full sentence forethought connectives.

That causes no ambiguity as far as I can see. Could you give
an example? {lo ge ko'a broda gi ko'e brode} would simply be
{da poi ke'a ge ko'a broda gi ko'e brode}.

> It also
> isn't clear when you would use a forethought sumti tail connective wherein
> you couldn't use a sentence connective.

I don't understand that sentence. Could you give an example?

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.