[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: kargu mleca

At 11:52 PM 07/21/2001 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:

The problem the gi'uste wants to avoid is that in {ko'a sisku
lo broda}, the quantifier of {lo broda} is at the bridi level, and
this is not what we want to claim in some cases. I don't want to
claim that there is something less expensive, such that I am looking
for that very something. But turning the x2 of sisku into a property
is a crazy way of solving this problem.

Let's compare three predicates where this issue comes up: sisku,
djica and nitcu. The gi'uste handles each of them differently:
sisku gets the object turned into a property, djica gets an event,
and nitcu apparently comes out unscathed.
Thereby evidencing apparently that in Lojban you cannot need something that does not exist %^)
There was a reason for each of these choices, albeit I admit colored by English usage. We can want both events and objects in English, but all events of wanting an object seem to be equivalent to wanting the event of possessing said object (or something closely akin thereto). I cannot imagine "wanting a property" unless one wants the event of "ckaji le ka co'e"
By contrast, we when we seek something, we aren't seeking an event of that something being/doing anything other than found. Yet we need an abstraction for the reason Jorge noted - nonexistence.
English "need" is conveyed by two different gismu: nitcu which takes an object and sarcu which takes an abstraction. I associated "need" with the related word "lack" and decided that sarcu would probably handle all cases of needing an abstraction. 


So, even when there is no quantification problem, we are supposed
to say weird stuff like:

    mi nitcu do i mi djica le nu do co'e i mi sisku le ka du do
    I need you. I want you. I'm looking for you.

instead of the expected {mi nitcu do i mi djica do i mi sisku do}.
It makes me wonder why we "expect" such parallelism, since there are many other gismu that have sumti-raising from some kind of abstaraction. 


Much better in my opinion is to leave them with their original
meaning and then say:

    mi nitcu lo'e kargu mleca
    I need something less expensive.

    mi djica lo'e kargu mleca
    I want something less expensive.

    mi sisku lo'e kargu mleca
    I'm looking for something less expensive.
I seem to remember hundreds of postings back in 1996 dealing with the needing or seeking of a box, which problem found no solution that satisfied all complaints. 

lojbab
--
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA                    703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org