mo'e (was: RE: [lojban] useless selmaho?

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>]

Adam:
> Isn't "mo'e" supposed to be used in cases like
> 
>     li mo'e re dirgo su'i mo'e re dirgo na du li mo'e vo dirgo
> 
> Though perhaps "loi vo lo dirgo na sumji loi re lo dirgo loi re lo
> dirgo" is better. (Book p. 456, ch. 18.18.3) Thus "mo'e lo spaji"
> would be a surprise, but can be used grammatically as a number. "A
> surprising number" would be "[mo'e] lo namcu poi [jai] spaji".

Or just "[mo'e] lo [jai] spaji".

--And.