[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] useless selmaho? (was: RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn

To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] useless selmaho? (was: RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:02:43 +0200
References: <F267X4RlGdzjKwCQ98B000143ea@hotmail.com>

Isn't "mo'e" supposed to be used in cases like

    li mo'e re dirgo su'i mo'e re dirgo na du li mo'e vo dirgo

Though perhaps "loi vo lo dirgo na sumji loi re lo dirgo loi re lo
dirgo" is better. (Book p. 456, ch. 18.18.3) Thus "mo'e lo spaji"
would be a surprise, but can be used grammatically as a number. "A
surprising number" would be "[mo'e] lo namcu poi [jai] spaji".

mu'o mi'e .adam.

Follow-Ups:
- mo'e (was: RE: [lojban] useless selmaho?
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

References:
- RE: [lojban] useless selmaho? (was: RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn
  - From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Qualities & Properties (was: Re: Another stab at a Record on ce'u
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] pe BAI <sumti> on tense markers
Previous by thread: RE: [lojban] useless selmaho? (was: RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn
Next by thread: mo'e (was: RE: [lojban] useless selmaho?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread