[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] META : Who is everyone (and what are they saying)
- To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [lojban] META : Who is everyone (and what are they saying)
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:32:11 -0400
- In-reply-to: <001301c13ea6$1fd48840$e729ca3e@oemcomputer>
At 01:52 PM 9/16/01 +0200, G. Dyke wrote:
Having been following the discussions more closely than usual these past few
days (hey! waiting for college to start gets pretty uneventful during the
last months, I've got a lot of time), I've come to the conclusion that I'm
missing a lot of the discussions because I've got no background on this. For
instance, are these words specific to americans and those who've known them
a long time or have they come about through lojban : "fiat" (as in "fiat
decides..."), "glorking", "glorkjunkied" (aha! the latter two are related),
elephant. Why do some people support and reject {gumri} ? (Don't you dare
tell me to go to the wiki, last time my telephone bill had trouble coming
out alive %^).
That is one reason I have feared the splitting of the community into these
multiple forums. The wiki seems to have introduced a whole new bunch of
about-Lojban slang, and the relevant usage of all but one of those words
you ask about seems to have been invented in the course of wiki
discussions. Thus even >I< would not know what the words meant without
reading the wiki.
"fiat" on the other hand is a standard English word roughly meaning "decree
from legal authority", with a certain connotation that the decision being
decreed is arbitrary. It seems in the above phrase to be contrasted with
"usage decides", wherein the language design starts to move from being
wholly prescriptive to wholly descriptive (and hence natural-language
like), the latter being necessary at some point in order to use Lojban for
most of the purposes people have had in mind for it.
Briefly, I think "glorking" or "glorking from context" refers to people
determining what a Lojban text means as much from context as from rules,
again a natural language process. A "glork-junkie" is one who feels that
this should be the norm, and is contrasted with the "hardliners" that are
seeking strict logical-semantic refinement in all aspects of the
language. The Elephant is yet another web tool, one that John Cowan is
working on, which will serve as a formal method of documenting positions on
language design issues so that we can remember what has been decided
without relying on my memory of (and agreement with) the decision. (The
reference is to the folklore idea that "an elephant never forgets" - I
don't recall the source of that bit of folklore).
Someone should be adding such terms to the Lojban glossary on the
lojban.org web page, if they survive, but in many cases they seem to only
be used a few times and then forgotten.
I'm also puzzled by Nick (who, if I've got it right has spent
one hell of a lot of time learning lojban) having views such as lojban never
succeeding, rafsi not being a good idea and ... what else?
I'll let Nick speak for himself %^)
I'd appreciate anyone who could help me by adding their beliefs and desires
for lojban (and who could give any other information that might be relevant
to newcomers - life around lojban-beginners is good but we want to graduate,
there isn't the same element of risk involved in posting there as there is
on lojban :-)
There is no real risk posting on this forum as compared to the other. I
*LIKE* to read the postings by beginners. You remind me that the language
community is still growing, and unlike a lot of the debates, I can
understand what you write %^).
Are there others who read the lojban-digest (not individual
mails? surely!) avidely hoping to better their lojban, but not often
putting their opinions forward because they're bound to lose against the
sheer bulk of emails coming from opposers...
With 250 subscribers who have remained subscribing during the volume of the
last couple of months, this must of course be the case.
An example of something that took me ages to understand : xod no longer
signs his emails so and doesn't have xod in his address ; how's a newcomer
supposed to work out who is referred to in the sentence "xod said...".
Another thing... it took me a month to work out that pycyn was lojban for
PC - who's name I eventually found in the reference grammar. This is NOT
your fault but it should give you an idea of how complicated life is...
We started to create a list of who's who in the Lojban community on the
lojban.org website, but other than a couple of key names that are in the
glossary, we relied on people adding themselves in. Some of the names are
clarified on the wiki, but not all.
Anyway, here's the list of information about me that might be useful, and
that I'd like to know about you (so far I've worked out that you don't go
arguing maths with pycyn - if you can help it - but knowing such things in
advance might be useful)
all of these are of course optional (as if you wouldn't tell me if this was
not information that you'd put on www)
Name: Gregory Dyke (greg.daik.) (which means sex : M ; what happenned to all
the girls? I don't seem to have seen many! lol)
Bob LeChevalier aka lojbab, President of la lojbangirz. since it started
back in 1987, and involved far more invisibly in Loglan since 1979 as a
friend of language inventor James Cooke Brown (JCB). My wife Nora, is
Secretary/Treasurer of LLG, doesn't read the list much, but is a co-founder
of the Lojban effort, as well as the first "outsider" that JCB granted
"member" status to in The Loglan Institute. She's been involved in Loglan
since 1975.
DOB:84/26/02 (see? you can put it whichever way you like)
On the other hand 53/11/07 is ambiguous, so I'll resolve it as 7 Nov 1953.
Occupation: student, IT, EPFL, Switzerland
Occupation: parent, unemployed computer systems requirements analyst,
sometime Lojban community leader
Hobbies (things I do when I'm not doing smth else): skiing, programming,
tolkien, his languages, lojban, working my way through w3c proposals (yep,
the geeky type)
reading (especially SF/fantasy), computer games, history, debating
education reform on the net, Russian language (non-fluent), linguistics and
Lojban, fantasy role-playing (D&D), astronomy (my degree subject 27 years ago)
What I think of lojban:
I've written enough about this in old JLs and on this forum, that people
don't need to hear it again %^)
I wish I could teach my kids (If and
when I have any) lojban, but it would be a bit cruel - so I probably won't.
Better to teach your wife and use it as a language to talk privately in
front of the kids, at which point they will insist on learning it %^).
lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org