[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] periodic hexadecimal reminder
At 05:00 PM 9/26/01 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Pierre Abbat wrote:
> I think {ju'u} is in the wrong selma'o. All other binary mex operands take
> two numbers and return a number.
Not necessarily. That may be the most common usage. But "addition" in the
context of non-numerical strings is usually interpreted as concatenation,
and Mex is used to handle that as well. Mex allows all manner of
operations, including operations on objects not normally considered to be
mathematical. In Lojban you really can compare apples and oranges (using
Mex). All you have to do is define what the basis for the comparison
is. (In slot machines, a cherry is greater than a lemon.)
>{ju'u} takes a naclerpoi and a number and
> returns a number.
That is the standard mathematical application of ju'u. But when I was
looking into Mex, I found all manner of strange notations and operations
that might be portrayed using Mex.
> ze bi'esu'i bi pi'i so = (7+8)*9
> ze bi'esu'i bi ju'u so = ?
> is it 14 (which is written 15 in base 9) or what?
It's nonsense.
I'm not sure I agree; rather it is moot. I understand (a+b) base c to mean
evaluate (a+b) assuming each is written in base c. It is only "nonsense"
because there is no reason to have used the bi'e since there is no standard
mathematical usage where different bases would be used for different
numbers without explicitly marking them so that 7 + 8base9 implicitly means
7 base 9 + 8 base 9.
Lojban does not purport to dictate the semantics of mathematics, which is
self consistent only within a single axiomatic context.
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org