RE: [lojban] Types of fu'ivla in natural languages

["Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>]

>How common are types 2, 3, and 4 fu'ivla in natural languages? (I don't
think
>it makes sense to speak of a type-1 fu'ivla in a language that doesn't have
a
>foreign-word marker.)

My sense is that type 1 is reasonably common, and in English is the same as
type 2. Note that we often mark foreign words by italicizing them. Type 3
don't occur in English, and type 4 are not randomly coined but are used when
a new idea is introduced.

                             --la kreig.daniyl.

     '.i do cu vanci le ba panje xusra
     .i denci gunma le se gidva'

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme:  0x5C3A1E74