[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] lo'e and NAhEBO
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [lojban] lo'e and NAhEBO
- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 01:40:02 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <000d01c175e3$9cf34860$ea32ca3e@oemcomputer> from "G. Dyke" at "Nov 25, 2001 08:00:55 pm"
G. Dyke scripsit:
> My second question: why is it that the refgram makes a big deal of NAhEBO
> (It certainly made a big impression on me) but it is almost never used. Am I
> wrong in thinking that na'ebo le broda is the same as le na'e broda?
Well, it's not that useful with descriptions, as you note, but with other
sumti, it can be quite handy:
A: ma catra le -sheriff
B: na'ebo mi
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan