Re: Uncertainties in EBNF Notation

[Arthur Hyun <cbmvax!uunet!rpi.edu!ash>]

>The elidable terminators make the language unambiguous, but may often be
>omitted without loss of ambiguity, especially when there is more than one
>in a row.  For example: [ deleted ]

I'd like to test my knowledge.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but this
is very similar, if not identical to the Common Lisp notation ]?
(that is, it closes all open parenthesis pairs, eg (go i (is store red]
paraphrasing the lojban into Lisp-like English).
						curiously,
						arthur