[lojban] Re: Baseline policy voting - semiofficial results

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:59:28PM -0500, Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group wrote:
> Here is the result of the baseline policy statement voting.
> 
> I'm asking Robin Powell to check the baselinevote balloting to make
> sure I didn't miss anyone, and to indicate any disagreement as to how
> someone voted (a couple of people did not write a simple "yes" or
> "no"; if Robin disagrees with me on how someone voted, the vote gets
> tossed.)
> 
> 
>  From baselinevote@lojban.org  (subject to verification by Robin Powell)
> 
> YES
> <vilva@xivas.animal.helsinki.fi>

Check.

> <jkominek@miranda.org>

Check.

> <pmatzke@ns1.macline.com>

Check, but arguably slightly unclear.  What he *actually* says is:
"I support the idea of a baseline. Having a stable dictionary and
learning materials should help Lojban increase its user base. I'm far
from proficient in the language."

And some other stuff that is irrelevant.

As the apparent official ratifier, I accept this as a yes vote.

> <fracture@allusion.net>

Check.

> <chris.double@double.co.nz>

Check.

> <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>

Check.

> <emaas@HotPOP.com>

Check.

> <jimc@math.ucla.edu>

Check.

> <noras@lojban.org>

Check.  (Big shocker there. 8)

> <Pycyn@aol.com>

Check.

> <rizen@surreality.us>

Check.

> <MugglesNSquibs@msn.com>

Check.

> <graywyvern2@yahoo.com>

Check.

> <dlb@patriot.net>

Check.

> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

Check.  (Duh.)

> <d95mback@dtek.chalmers.se>

Check.

> <phma@webjockey.net>

Check.

> <jbhodges@usit.net>

Check.

> <araizen@cs.huji.ac.il>

Check.

> <rspeer@MIT.EDU>

Check.

> <mbays@freeshell.org>

Check.

> <warner@lothar.com>=redist-lojban@lothar.com

Check.

> <jexom@altern.org>

Check.

> <gudlat@web.de>

Check.

*MISSING*:

YES: <b.gohla@gmx.de>

> NO
> <dyoungyokota@att.net>

Check.

> <sbelknap@uic.edu>

Check, but slightly arguable.  To wit, he says:  "My vote will remain nay
until the lojban-Loglan schism is addressed explicitly in some fashion
in the baseline policy statement.".  Given that a draft is being worked
on to address this issue, I wonder is Steve wouldn't like to reconsider.

> Unofficial vote results  (pending verification by Robin)
> 44 yes
> 4  no
> 
> The baseline policy is ratified.

With bells on.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/    ***    I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/   ***   to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi