[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Baseline policy voting - semiofficial results
Robin:
> > <pmatzke@ns1.macline.com>
>
> Check, but arguably slightly unclear. What he *actually* says is:
> "I support the idea of a baseline. Having a stable dictionary and
> learning materials should help Lojban increase its user base. I'm far
> from proficient in the language."
>
> And some other stuff that is irrelevant
>
> As the apparent official ratifier, I accept this as a yes vote
>
> > <sbelknap@uic.edu>
>
> Check, but slightly arguable. To wit, he says: "My vote will remain nay
> until the lojban-Loglan schism is addressed explicitly in some fashion
> in the baseline policy statement.". Given that a draft is being worked
> on to address this issue, I wonder is Steve wouldn't like to reconsider
If you're recording people's views & reasons, then mine is that I was
in favour of almost all of the policy, agreeable to all of it if it
represented consensus, and opposed to a policy containing so many
specifics being put forward for a vote without opinion on the specifics
having first been canvassed.
Since the subsequent debate did in fact provide an opportunity for
opinion to be heard, and since the policy in all specifics does seem
to command consensus, I count myself as supporting the policy qua
policy.
--And.