[lojban] Re: CMENE=BRIVLA (was Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.")

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:03:35AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> 
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 05:17:46AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > >  Robin, will your parser be capable of dealing with {le broda joi
> > >  mi}?
> > 
> > Of course.  Any wart that can be attributed to LR(1) limitations
> > should not exist in my parser, that was sort of the point.
> > 
> > It already does, in fact, handle "le broda joi mi brode", and in the
> > right way:
> 
> Great! That removes the only excuse for A as a separate selmaho from
> JA. JA should be merged with JOI and A be done away with.

I'm not sure I follow you.

Oh, you mean that with infinite lookahead the difference between 
"le broda <connective> brode" and "le broda <connective> le brode" is
obvious, correct?  Hence no need for two sets of connectives for the two
cases?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rocki morsi