[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: CMENE=BRIVLA (was Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.")

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: CMENE=BRIVLA (was Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.")
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <20040407180756.GD5197@digitalkingdom.org>
Reply-to: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org

--- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> Oh, you mean that with infinite lookahead the difference between 
> "le broda <connective> brode" and "le broda <connective> le brode" is
> obvious, correct?  Hence no need for two sets of connectives for the two
> cases?

Exactly.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban] Re: CMENE=BRIVLA (was Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.")
  - From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>

References:
- [lojban] Re: CMENE=BRIVLA (was Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.")
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: Official parser and "lo ni'a zu crino"
Next by Date: [lojban] [OT] dai
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: CMENE=BRIVLA (was Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.")
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: CMENE=BRIVLA (was Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread