[lojban] Re: Official parser bug with li?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:02:08AM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> 
> | --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> |
> |> The official parser chokes on
> |>
> |> li panono .a le zmadu
> |>
> |> I have no idea why, and I can't find a work-around.
> |
> |
> | It probably expects a second operand after {.a} {li panono lo'o a
> | le zmadu}?
> |
> | mu'o mi'e xorxes
> 
> .a can be used to mix operands? I thought it was purely a sumti
> connective.

You're fooling yourself!  We're living in a dictatorship!  An autocratic
society in which...

Oh, wait.  Connective, not collective, sorry.

Yes, ek can be used in mex:

operand <- operand-1 ((ek / joik) stag? KE free* operand (KEhE free*)?)?

operand-1 <- operand-2 (joik-ek operand-2)*

operand-2 <- operand-3 ((ek / joik) stag? BO free* operand-2)?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi