[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: Again {lo}.



On 5/27/05, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Sorry, I meant to say, "means at least."
> Is it really true that {lo} cannot be used in
> singular claims, only in general ones? 

Huh? Who said that?

{lo gerku cu xagrai pendo lo remna} CAN be used
to translate "the dog is man's best friend". Nodody
said it cannot be used in singular claims.

mu'o mi'e xorxes