On 8/31/05, Aleksej R. Serdyukov <deletesoftware@yandex.ru> wrote:
If the shifts had worked as I thought they did, it would be (using "za'o
senva" from tiki; supposing that the stress always has to be specified -
just for the example):
.i mi nA'ekA'e cIkna
ru'o
.и ми сЭ кАвбу
lo'a
.i le mi clIva pIkta
zai cnino bu selylerfu bu
cu pó'o sávru
lo'a
.i cUsku ledU'u
...
I see. The first {lo'a} would be in Cyrillic, I suppose. {ло'а}?
But that's ungrammatical. {ru'o} and {lo'a} must be followed
by a lerfu, they are not indicators in UI that could appear
almost anywhere.
And {zai cnino bu selylerfu bu} is a sumti, which in this
case falls in the x2 of {savru}.
The shifts in LAU only affect lerfu (BY, word BU). They
don't affect the alphabet in which they are written, but only
what symbol those words represent.
mu'o mi'e xorxes