[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Original orthography draft now online for critique
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: Original orthography draft now online for critique
- From: "LakMeer Kravid" <lakmeerkravid@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 01:36:55 +1200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=BRJ16ToZ4UiHPlNAZFEyKiH3sbAJ1PDm/2t4Dj/0QG8=; b=c+KW7NdIcsfcgGUNLP5/w6LPGIcv27Gxo7/BW9XYZKnU/88F4Axl8TOicquAfJAXa9i2upJQUTTLCYcSTobfAQSszSexiGovKslyOjHzjk5gZuyiSFVGrVgceUGHX4b/9JBvbSsn2zIJFpk8bYl8LCiAuhPLu20StQ12iY5jsZQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WVnjFzOCC6JK5m/UT5VT/nOaJgtTg8MFaaG7mumAKjb0RjfCtGsLqPr1svVENdQcu1pqfqyX+rlhyXbygq9GBpys54ljlRg6PCIUywRqWlYWRsDQH3eAxYT7qkkXp6KVrU65cYVJlaqEa99yh9MYIQs0IrckGQtP4GqgCcyn6NE=
- In-reply-to: <47F8B7C3.5030200@perpetuum-immobile.de>
- References: <a25fac030804051701p764c8404td0661e40ff0868d2@mail.gmail.com> <47F8B7C3.5030200@perpetuum-immobile.de>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Timo Paulssen
<timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:
>
> The script really looks beautiful.
Thanks! My girlfriend helped me pretty it up a lot, she does calligraphy.
> I have discovered...it's impossible to write spaceless style with it :(
The whole spaceless thing isn't really a big deal, it was just an
aesthetic demonstration :) Please don't get hung up about it.
> Another thing is that I'm not really sure, if it's really a good idea to
> have "s" be just a dash, even though it really does make sense in that
> quadrangle concept thingie.
> It might be possible to use a small (or big) flick below the letters to
> mark stressed syllables, but i'm not sure how to remedy the S thing.
I completed rev1 some weeks ago, and rev2 is already quite healthy.
I'm going with a bar that floats above the letters in a Devanagari
sort of way to mark stresses, mainly thinking of notating cmene.
The S is a bit dodgy looking in that version of the font, because the
kerning is all equal and the text looks really drawn out. I'll post
rev2 when I can, where the kerning has been adjusted to be a bit more
natural and the S is a bit clearer.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My suggestion for the vowels is that you interchange e and i,
> and also a and u, that way the patterns make more sense, and also the
> diphthongs get the lighter symbols.
Funny you should say, this is originally how I had them! I changed
them because I'm also working on a simplified, non-cursive version for
everyday handwriting, where the vowels simplify to characters which
resemble logical operators while matching the cmavo. That is to say,
when you write {.e} it looks like ∧ and {.a} looks like ∨. As for
whether this nifty feature take precedence over the more intuitive
arrangement, I humbly ask this list for advice.
Thanks for your comments! All criticisms are welcomed.