[lojban] Re: Original orthography draft now online for critique

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

I'd say somewhere a bit above the middle of the range of proposals (a B of some sort -- roughly on a par with the Latin alphabet).  Having to go back to dot the 'i's is a defect as is the fact that the use of diacritics for phoneme distinction increases the likelihood of misspellings and/or misreadings.  That aside. the various symbols are fairly distinct, though perhaps unduly complex.  It is unclear whether in a running hand the difference between a loop and a point will be maintained -- the misreading problem again.  But it does look nice -- in a Thai-Armenian sort of way.

----- Original Message ----
From: LakMeer Kravid <lakmeerkravid@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Sent: Saturday, April 5, 2008 7:01:04 PM
Subject: [lojban] Original orthography draft now online for critique

My first draft has been uploaded to
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Original%20lojban%20orthography
Please comment and make suggestions, I'm open to drastic reformations.
I'm also looking for a name for it.
mu'o


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.






      ____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.  
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.