[lojban] Re: xu do tergaskanga'e?

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Saturday 10 May 2008 12:51, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > pe'i mi ca jimpe .i smuni fa genai lo ganse je kansa be lo te ganse
> > gi lo ganse be da joi de bei lo fadni te ganse be da .enai de .i zoi
> > gy synesthete gy .i pe'i zo terga'e na mutce sidju .i lo se ganse
> > .enai lo te ganse cu steci .i e'u zo jolga'e zo'u ko'a ganse ko'e joi
> > ko'i ko'o [ko'u]
>
> I got totally lost trying to figure out "lo ganse je kansa li'o".

{lo ganse je kansa be lo te ganse} = "Observer with a sensor".
That's how I first understood {tergaskanga'e}, but then it didn't
seem any different from plain {ganse}.

{lo ganse be da joi de bei lo fadni te ganse be da .enai de}
="Oberver of X&Y by means of the ordinary sensor for X
and not Y"

> "jolga'e"
> sounds better to me, more succinct. How would you say "Lisko perceives the
> first conjugation as red"?

I would say {lo pamoi ke selbri klesi cu simlu lo ka xunre kei la liskos},
but if the idea is to use {jolga'e} then I suppose {la liskos cu jolga'e
lo pamoi ke selbri klesi lo xunre}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.