[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Assertions of time-relations and precision of abstractions
Am Montag 26 Mai 2008 18:17:55 schrieb Michael Turniansky:
> What if it had instead asserted "I eat apples after Hell freezes
> over/after pigs fly"? The whole sentence is still valid, and may even
> be true, but that doesn't mean you've eaten any apples at all, yet.
> We will have to wait and see.... Remember, the main bridi had no
> tense associated with it, so it's simply asserting a fact, not
> necessarily one that has come to fruition yet.
So, would it be valid so sum up: If {.i broda ba lo nu brode} is given,
{broda} happens iff {brode} happens?
--
regards,
Nam
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.