[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Why's there no ka abstraction for nelci?
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: Why's there no ka abstraction for nelci?
- From: "Michael Turniansky" <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 07:46:10 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=6F7PUs9zlcdYhc11YJ2WmFxbuzXtYTn4blMO5AXFF08=; b=M+gUUjTIdl/YedIkiNjwQzJx8dzHskl+hca7KmmbR/vgOGUINlNs6z/Csebhqt2xf6bCxJiILHzX57jRdAeESSCcF4luUZ07Ul7S++Cv14cBKz+NsCpUxytRuzjRxk6poUS3rQHKEy0uBKz8jiW7dmgunfUsHiZPBMZUgdZVEdI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Yb3znKyVcik0Lp0X42Z40iqkH6WYDV7o7Y0HMRdZM1dSCVhx1IkmmVfd33bUQCxgwKsKw/xvw6Nefx7ApYLEWdobvuJBEc6PRioTEgs05YjcJL8UAKSp6p12ZyjgzZu1qSRi+W0dSbZL34EnbPivLnW1HrqpmGnjLU75cfPKR2k=
- In-reply-to: <925d17560805281621n26b0aefel90d6631f03d9a5ae@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <200805271524.57754.eldrikdo@gmail.com> <925d17560805281621n26b0aefel90d6631f03d9a5ae@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, here is a (complete, I think) list of the gismu that have place
> structures like that of {cnino} (not counting :
>
> cfipu: x1 confuses/baffles x2 due to property x3.
> cizra: x1 is strange/weird/deviant/bizarre/odd to x2 in property x3.
> cnino: x1 is new/unfamiliar/novel to x2 in poperty x3 [by standard x4].
> dicra: x1 interrupts/stops/halts x2 due to property x3.
> fange: x1 is alien/foreign/unfamiliar to x2 in property x3.
> mansa: x1 satisfies x2 in property x3.
> melbi: x1 is beautiful/pleasant to x2 in property x3 [by standard x4].
> slabu: x1 is old/familiar/well-known to x2 in property x3 [by standard x4].
> trina: x1 attracts/appeals to/lures x2 with property x3.
> vajni: x1 is important/significant to x2 in property x3.
> xajmi: x1 is funny/comical to x2 in property x3.
> zdile: x1 is amusing/entertaining to x2 in property x3.
> zunti: x1 interferes with/hinders/disrupts x2 due to property x3.
>
> (Any others?)
>
> There are some others that could have had this structure but don't
> (dirba, fanza, misno, pluka, spaji, xamgu, xlali, ...) but they are harder
> to search for systematically so I don't attempt to make a complete list.
It's funny, but I always wondered the same about (similar scale,
but opposite end) "xebni". Usually one has a reason for hating
something, and it often comes up in utterances (2.08 MGh (million
Google hits) for "hate * because"). It seems odd that lojban doesn't
have a dedicated tersu'i for it. But I never wondered about it
"aloud" to the lojbo cecmu, because I figured there is no point, since
the gi'uste has been baselined for the foreseeable future .
--gejyspa
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.