[lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> wrote:
>
>> > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=le'ai
>
> It doesn't have to actually make the replacements at the parser level.  Just
> having a grammar for it so that it can parse would be totally fine.  It can
> be treated as an informal indicator that has to be interpreted at a higher
> level.

An internal grammar for the construction, and then making the
construction a free indicator, is doable. But in that case it won't be
of help for fixing something that is grammatically broken, like
SI/SA/SU are meant to do. For example {mi kjama le zarji lo'ai kjama
sa'ai klama le'ai} will parse as "{mi} followed by uninterpretable
gibberish", so it will never get to a higher level for interpretation.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.