[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
- From: "Daniel Brockman" <daniel@brockman.se>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:08:59 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=mH7vS8MOKAciGxVbH+1tvDr6NDPR9ZuoqujSqqIVUoU=; b=wMCzbtUy1ZO/DWFtzwUcrhoX9fbtWiheBAetC3x38Ga0JRQNKXkZuA5aGYqOOfmv/s K1mJgIEYtfVq2YZILIENxO83R1eswDlpmvv0trRGnLKL5iexzuRlvXS4AKoCuLfEjlRP BCR8YZKY4plB7FGRlwqarQfhYFufI3SAJZ9Xs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=j5ngWCR9Ef3PkOCN3cFMtY/OlF21f44DD1Izeqe6q+GxMd5VV4SqTB/K/fleExQ/lv m/dBsSKQr9XRolQEiensdJPfuEYq+bPLuy+P+Dz8mbfcXCbvRt78K0rUnrqGYxpT7bqn jy+1gsqGW+IaEwvUNwHlQObE6AoatsgH0D4YI=
- In-reply-to: <925d17560811070554m1b3a060ds5904bb7451ce7920@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <737b61f30811070541l45110d3dsc5144714e926e32d@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811070554m1b3a060ds5904bb7451ce7920@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
> "tei" and "tau" are what I would have
> liked for "la'e di'u" and "la'e de'u", or something like that.
Interesting. Those are some wasted quality short cmavo.
I keep thinking we should deprecate all those short cmavo that
nobody uses as soon as possible, so we can start using them
for something else eventually.
> But I
> wouldn't mind not having "di'u" (and all its cousins) there in the
> first place.
Agreed. Those are the only members of KOhA I neither remember
nor use, except for {di'u} and {di'e}.
> "lu'e tei", "lu'e tau" would have been the compounds to
> be used in the more rare cases when we do want to refer to the
> expressions themselves.
Very wise, Zipf-wise.
--
Daniel Brockman
daniel@brockman.se
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.