[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
From: "Daniel Brockman" <daniel@brockman.se>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:57:34 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=VyM9CejQZZIdl2QNAaUTBNVAhaKBrjCc+6QMkigaaVU=; b=HEH1FdYjoYLX9veCDKamTlvVFa0ELld4dawb5DMDnNoY+XO6D0yDVDFde+lh1Ko6Rc 5Nk9eFKeNVvdWYc++4ezUZItRCajeGboq7RKocQ13NH9d8hNr52ux6KlR/LWTvolXSHV kCeMY/0bmThvPgZM3fLfg3m3Oa3rf81RCU4cI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=QaJsd+F3VqdxlvwQUdxmDwnyVixXmzr9yBc+8r8JDWaJ9Y8Ill/0G3TP96w03LZFeU oZzTD+HhFiR5NWfgC8Jw7zyNSIfR/odX2PxQXCYlgILvShpIX/203ors4VnYz0PZqf/G 2JDX8ovdB/+XzvHF0Jw4ZxCqstepAbdkMDLKg=
In-reply-to: <20081107142028.GC2447@nvg.org>
References: <737b61f30811070541l45110d3dsc5144714e926e32d@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811070554m1b3a060ds5904bb7451ce7920@mail.gmail.com> <a36d16c80811070608t520ae621yeec8276edb017eed@mail.gmail.com> <20081107142028.GC2447@nvg.org>
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org

> Anyway, reassignment of extant cmavo is not likely to happen, for reasons of forwards-compatibility.

If nobody uses a cmavo and we deprecate it, is it still "extant"?

-- 
Daniel Brockman
daniel@brockman.se


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com>

References:
- [lojban] la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Daniel Brockman" <daniel@brockman.se>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread