[lojban] Re: more grammar discussion

["Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 19:28, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK, what about this one:
>>
>>> sumti-tail-1 <- selbri relatives? / quantifier selbri relatives? / quantifier sumti
>>
>> becomes
>>
>> sumti-tail-1 <- quantifier? selbri relatives? / quantifier sumti
>
> What happens with the sumti-tail "pa moi"?

Hmm. I see your point. But check this out:

> selbri-6 <- tanru-unit (BO free* selbri-6)? / NAhE? free* guhek selbri gik selbri-6

Another instance of gek (or guhek) not letting its second clause as
flexible as its first.

Chris Capel
-- 
"What is it like to be a bat? What is it like to bat a bee? What is it
like to be a bee being batted? What is it like to be a batted bee?"
-- The Mind's I (Hofstadter, Dennet)


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.