[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: About the negators
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: About the negators
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:21:17 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=KJ6e9GyoLecHj+aaThtBZwghZuMtxX0XMH9dyn8dfoA=; b=Sugj1toPkFLleiizNPblQOUbq1nNRgK1Bts1yojUrf1Nwx2lbAVzQc+MqwFhjFhM2b 4sNOLbnwY+Pi+LZeFpXXDLUc5u2XssxfZepdiFeINs+mdUrzF/Iy63ukkQNm2zqmn4dA MbboCTXlFF9k7qfPUKdpktQBVe0iAhwHDz9xk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=AGK/znbjPIX0ZOAw5Q6et6YWZUiUDOnvNI1iqWbiFE1ZjBIj2N+izzXotwIDfxYvi+ mGzlmuNDNGMy+hqvCYGkhquo2tp1NKSmGNv6lkIBI/UJ7Za+W1xOZ2+HOndpWWEfHtRX wlEGAVmSBeW+DoshpE3C8KWImk1NzIdXcIwME=
- In-reply-to: <96f789a60812170455k54431b6tfe69c2f528bed595@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <70697fa40812152124u39a177a2hc52d604e9a30e469@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560812160908j49f6d818y1fdcdf21bfddfb28@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60812161137u6919c05cyf5958e9949ccfaf7@mail.gmail.com> <200812161859.52969.phma@phma.optus.nu> <925d17560812161637y2caa5a41i32372fc376cf603a@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60812170455k54431b6tfe69c2f528bed595@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I suggest this conversation has now grown well beyond the limits of
> lojban-beginners list.
(I am responding in lojban-list.)
> Suffice it to say that while the use of na is
> well-defined in simple bridi, its meaning in very complicated sentence with
> both existential qualifiers and bridi tails is not well-defined.
If {su'o da na broda gi'e brode} counts as a "very complicated
sentence", then the characterization of Lojban as "spoken predicate
logic" is almost a sham. The relative scopes of quantifiers, logical
connectives and negation should be very straightforward.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.