[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Gender neutrality?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:00:26PM +0000, Minimiscience wrote:
> de'i li 20 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Danny Piccirillo .fy. cusku zoi
> skamyxatra.
> > If there are terms for boy, man, girl, and woman, there are surely terms for
> > one who identifies as masculine or feminine, or androgynous, genderqueer, etc
> > and those are the terms i think should be preferred in common conversation
> > when talking about someone who has a gender identity (all humans).
> .skamyxatra
>
> If you mean words that are suitable for individuals regardless of their gender
> identities, yes, there are words for those. "Human" is "{remna}," and "person"
> (not necessarily human) is "{prenu}." "Child" is "{verba}," "offspring" is
> "{panzi}," "parent" is "{rirni}," "sibling" is "{tunba}," "uncle/aunt" is
> "{famti}," et cetera.
And, in fact, most of us use {remna} or {prenu} almost all of the
time (that is, except when a distinction is important). I prefer
{remna}, because I wish to reduce confusion when our future robot
overlords arrive, but most people use {prenu}.
-Robin
--
They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something
other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.