[lojban] Re: xorlo

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Well, to ease both our discomforts, I note that we do disagree about whether lo requires a collective reading and about what , if anything, loi etc. mean.



----- Original Message ----
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 6:08:29 PM
Subject: [lojban] Re: xorlo

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:14 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Well, I think xorxes and I will disagree here: I think that an external
> quantifier forces a distributive reading and it is at least possilbe that
> xorxes does not

I do agree that outer quantifiers are always distributive. Strangely
enough, we seem to be on the same page on practically everything (as
long as generics and intensional contexts don't crop up). This is a
very odd situation. :)

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.


      


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.