[lojban] Re: Abstractors {ni} and {jei} (and {ka})

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

that'd be awesome.  I've heard that the main reason we're not trying to promote lojban yet is that it's not "complete".  But for completion the bpfk needs to finish definitions.  But for bpfk to finish definitions they need to not be "comatose".  But there are a set number of spots on it and no-one wants to relinquish their seat.  How would dbrock get on (which I'm all for, he's hella jbo-knowledgeable whenever I've talked to him) without someone leaving.

2009/11/6 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> wrote:
[...]

> Well, I guess that's enough to get started.

Great summary of the issue!

If you really want some official answers I suggest:

(1) you join the BPFK (obviously you are qualified)
(2) you write the definitions for "ni" and "jei" (and perhaps for the
rest of the NUs too, if you want).

That section is currently assigned to Robin, but he might be happy to
give it to you if you ask nicely.

I have described the BPFK in the past as being dormant, but I don't
think that's a fair description anymore. I think comatose is more
appropriate at this point. We are in desperate need of new blood.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.