[lojban] Re: Abstractors {ni} and {jei} (and {ka})

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
>  But for bpfk to finish definitions they need
> to not be "comatose".  But there are a set number of spots on it and no-one
> wants to relinquish their seat.

There is no such restriction. Anyone able and willing can join.
There's no need for anyone to relinquish their seat.

> How would dbrock get on (which I'm all for,
> he's hella jbo-knowledgeable whenever I've talked to him) without someone leaving.

He just needs to ask Robin, he is probably the one who knows what the
exact formal procedure for joining is (if any). I suppose all it takes
is approval by all or most the members, (or rather no explicit
objections, as waiting for explicit approval could take for ever).

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.