[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: I'm writing a parser
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: I'm writing a parser
- From: Oren <get.oren@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:00:08 +0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=w2ZT83GPf/J+HuuAnQmAPc2PqtJO9EJWyJLrr0dQYnI=; b=NzGqbE7eFITj/t2x8QZ/u40ultt47FtHnBMvv848ovonOhCbIqejC4Rd8erJucm8rP fvADv8KD7DmUyp3U0P7xWMase5zH20/zA5QfrUt81Zjvskcc9NuWESQQWyMFWsWJXwWb Fba4qKKttTgekv15zsp+XLvZZEspmsoK7Yb9k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=lmxCJuVxmDX0dRIKSrnsF+1J+lWYzgneh9pEMBw2hBM3P1SuSFNaAGLcdXYVJ1pBI9 QHONd8/9Ppy46px/uJ8ySqo6KZFtKiuIhb6F9aVB/PCarK1WzRo1FWrLs/1/yDgO8c29 YGfJTd9gT56O14xZVwUDn3VyI3L1RlHpXehbg=
- In-reply-to: <a8b45380911252209v2adc3ea9tcf77280f62882b80@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <a8b45380911252209v2adc3ea9tcf77280f62882b80@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Woah, should I upgrade to Python 3? I tried running it in 2.6.4 and
got tons of errors for function calls like:
function(arg=value):
and after I regexed them all out, it stopped at a function call
claiming that '\n' was invalid syntax ... .i ju'ocu'i ki'a ma
Anyhow, it looks like nice clean code! Assuming it runs, what's the
biggest challenge right now?
mu'o mi'e ku'us
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 14:09, purpleposeidon <purpleposeidon@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://github.com/purpleposeidon/zirsam/
>
> It needs a ton of work still. For example, dendrography, the
> grammar-parsing-bit, doesn't like {oi broda}, and I haven't tested
> thaumatology, the magic-word portion, sufficiently. Nor have I tested
> the non-standard alphabets. And much more. However, I'd like to draw
> attention of its existence outside of IRC.
>
> My greatest concern right now is parsing valid lojban, not not parsing
> invalid lojban. My motivation for writing this is that I'd like to
> make a semantics engine. I believe Nick Nicholas (?) wrote something
> like that using camxes, tho I haven't used it.
>
> mu'o mi'e djeims
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
> you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.