On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:I don't know about official, but I would say for example that "ge ti
>
> jufra in particular has always seemed kind of weird to me. Everywhere
> through the red book we see things like {bridi}, but then all of a sudden
> there's this concept of a "sentence" which as far as I know has no official
> definition. Or am I wrong about that?
cmalu gi ta barda" is one jufra that contains two bridi (in the
bridi=text sense). So jufra is more general than bridi. Also, a jufra
can have a prenex, whereas the bridi presumably is only the part that
comes after the prenex.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.