On 2009-12-21, 白松 Oren <
baisong@gvbchina.org.cn> wrote:
> I had a brief research position at university of Rochester (NY state)
> under Dan Gildea, where they have a close-knit AI, computational
> linguistics and neurological programs. I worked on a CYK decoder for
> Chinese English machine translation, and the first several weeks of my
> research were basically coming to terms with the history Machine
> translation outlined in that paper; the rise of computational
> linguistics in the 50s and 60s and then the adaptation to statistical
> models in the 80s and 90s.
>
> As for where 'getting computers understanding predicate logic' is, I'm
> not sure what to say, but I always thought that first-order predicate
> logic was the foundation of declarative languages like prolog.
>
> Anyhow, the state of the program at U of R (which I'm told is pretty
> advanced) is investigating hybrid models of various dynamic
> programming algorithms to raise BLEU scores-- everyone's invested in
> the statistical (i.e. NOT interlingual) approach, and trying to figure
> out how to maximize performance. I think that there would be real
> advantages to using lojban as an interlingual medium, instead of
> essentially trying to imitate humans through machine learning, but
> when you have huge corpora of bilingual (or better) natural language
> data and virtually no bilingual corpora with lojban, it's just
> infeasible. There were a few attempts to use Esperanto for that
> purpose a while back (even before this paper), and no one seems to
> cite them, except as failures.
>
> Here's a really good up-to-date intro to MT:
>
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AYZKIeNnTBe2ZGd4azRrZm1fNTI2ZnpnYmRrZ2g
>
> And a powerpoint version with lots of diagrams:
>
http://people.csail.mit.edu/people/koehn/publications/tutorial2003.pdf
>
> mu'o mi'e .ku'us.
>
>
> On 2009-12-21, Jon "Top Hat" Jones <
eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I recently came across
>> this<
http://www.lojban.org/files/why-lojban/mactrans.txt>paper, which
>> discusses various methods of machine translation methods. In it
>> it is mentioned that computers are not able to understand first-order
>> (i.e.
>> predicate) logic. Since the paper is nearly 2 decades old, I was
>> wondering
>> if anyone here knows what progress there has been in making it
>> understandable by computers.
>>
>>
>> --
>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>>
>> .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu
>>
>