On Sunday 03 January 2010 21:57:13 Geoff Hacker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just looked up "desk" in the "current" version of the jvoste (it is
> "bijyjbu") and do not think that its place structure is very user-friendly:
>
> x1 = jubme1 (table), x2 = jubme2 (table material), x3 = jubme3 (leg), x4 =
> briju2 (office worker)
> If I talk about a desk in an office, I am really highly unlikely to be
> referring to it in the context of what material or legs it has. I am far
> more likely to be saying that it is so-and-so's desk, and maybe after that
> further details about the office in which the desk appears, so I would have
> thought a more logical place structure was:
>
> x1 = jubme1 (table), x2 = briju2 (office worker) x3 = briju1 (office) x4 =
> briju3 (office location) and then *maybe* x5 = jubme2 (table material - so
> I could say, e.g., that it is a bijyjbu be fu lo [mahogany].)
>
> What do people think, and how would the jvoste get changed if a different
> consensus were reached?
I think the place structure should be kept as it is, for jvojva reasons. An