Re: [lojban] Re: Fw: bridi tail negation

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

2010/3/4 Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>:
> But what if he wanted to emphasize the x2 place?  Like {lo zarci se klama
> mi} instead of {mi klama lo zarci}?

(You do need "cu" in front of "se klama".)

I'm not sure I understand your question,

mu'o mi'e xorxes

> 2010/3/4 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Lindar Greenwood
>> <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >> ?.i na'e se zanfri fa lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda gi'e na tavla}?
>> >
>> > I have nothing helpful to contribute other than pointing out that you
>> > didn't need to explicitly mark {fa} if you used {se}.
>> > It isn't wrong, it's just redundant.
>>
>> Actually, he wouldn't need "fa" if he hadn't used "se". With "se", he
>> does need "fa" because he sent the place he wants to fill, originally
>> x2, to x1.
>>
>> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
>> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
>> you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.
>>
>
>