> 2010/3/5 Jorge Llambías <
jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:16 AM, MorphemeAddict <
lytlesw@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I once stated that the emphasis of the arguments changes when SE is
>> > used,
>> > but was told that SE does not cause such change in emphasis. It would be
>> > handy if it did.
>>
>> I think bringing an argument to the front does make it more topical.
>> But in this case, it was not really brought to the front, or it was
>> brought to the front only to be pushed back again with "fa":
>>
>> zanfri ko'a -> se zanfri fa ko'a
>>
>> So the difference in this case is not really about ko'a, but about
>> where the elided zo'e is:
>>
>> (zo'e) zanfri ko'a -> se zanfri fa ko'a (zo'e)
>>
>> In the second form the experiencer is perhaps even more irrelevant
>> than in the first form.
>>
>> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
lojban-list-request@lojban.org
>> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to
http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
>> you're really stuck, send mail to
secretary@lojban.org for help.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to
http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to
secretary@lojban.org for help.