[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] transitive & intransitive
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] transitive & intransitive
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:10:06 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a+4Wrt7sEdM1aguz909euvHUlOtugmeEO54Q+RPmeto=; b=Q0cG0RPcu6kjocQUNt/g72i6TfdN4jI59XBreRpgowV2WG/meuxeZyFsDs/HMrvkRQ ZnVwFbg23ZuH92w0IgAXc8vuBrY944MQnXn8UADV/JNFXTR652gwnIwXkTu8DzgPwUlZ qQjf9yzDAMvc/Y+eiE/GfeBZm4MzU3WtJcc3s=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LPT5vyFUi7FfJBdjbjfi8oVtRFzy9UkI7ziDm7/gAkH2PaAyfc7f9Zr9lx5mSdL0E6 KwTTVRVtt5VHeG2dS1vI3GP8aqRiooDJ31q2/1AJE1IpAyr3CGnI08u6bX+strWUcTWt Rb60XhJxzopqVjhRENMW4FgmUySUszWasKba4=
- In-reply-to: <4de8c3931003071055y5142a443nfa9ea6b0ce478dc9@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <4de8c3931003071055y5142a443nfa9ea6b0ce478dc9@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:55 PM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> The gimste says about "sance":
>
> [x2 sounds (intransitive verb)]
>
> Since an intransitive verb has by definition only one core argument,
> this usage of "sance" would have to preclude the syntactic (not
> semantic) existence of "sance"s other argument, x1.
It means: "x2 sounds (the intransitive use of the English verb "to
sound"), as in "the bell sounds", rather than the transitive use in
"John sounds the bell".
> So, what form of bridi is the abvoe gimste note on "sance" assuming to
> be intransitive?
It's a note about the English verb "to sound", not about the Lojban "sance".
mu'o mi'e xorxes