[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] la .alis.

Jorge Llambías, On 28/03/2010 15:14:

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> wrote:

But centuries of Latin typographic practice have evolved because
those practices are *useful* to readers (as useful as the full
stop) and I can see no reason not to pursue my project
Please do pursue it. (The full stop is not used in Lojban as in the Latin typographic practice though.) 

IMO /./ is a phoneme whose primary allophone is [?]. That does not imply owt about how it shd be rendered graphologically or typographically, tho.


I would appreciate it if anyone who *is* interested in this would
say so, as I'd like to discuss the options regarding redundant
markup of quoted material.


I'm interested.


I'm interested too, and in the general question of how to reconcile the highly evolved traditions of roman typography with Lojban. But it's probably realistic to recognize that most Lojbanists have no interest in such reconciliation, and would wish for the typography to be wholly subjugated to prevailing Lojban conventions.

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.