Re: Lojban: You're Doing it Worng (was: Re: [lojban] la .alis.)

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think you have the authority to overthrow the current authority.
>>
>
> Never said I did. However, assuming Robin's proposal is accepted, based on
> my reading of it, all jbopre is considered a member of the BPFK. As such, I
> am not trying to overthrow the current authority, but merely doing my part
> to get the job done.

It doesn't say all jbopre, it says all LLG members. Offhand I don't recall whether you're in the Logical Language Group, but I certainly encourage you (and all active jbopre) to pursue membership.

My interpretation was from this line: "The BPFK should be open to anyone who is seriously working on learning the language (and, in fact, the BPFK should be in Lojban as much as possible: this is for formal decisions about the future of the language, by people who actually use it)."

 

-Eppcott

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.