Re: [lojban] la .alis.

[Michael Everson <michael.everson@gmail.com>]

On 30 Mar 2010, at 16:20, Jonathan Jones wrote:

>> This still does not mean that a markup apparatus is unhelpful for a language like Lojban. Chinese and Irish have interrogative particles, and yet they use the question mark. Yes, Lojban is special and interesting because of its particles, but that doesn't mean that a totally minimalist typography for it is inherently "superior" to a more familiar typography with markup apparatus. In my opinion.
> 
> I do not have to ability to judge what method is "superior", nor do I claim to do so. I do however, have the ability to state what, in my opinion, is "preferred", and what, in actual fact, is "common", the "totally minimalist typography" being both of these.

OK, it looks as though we understand one another.

Michael

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.