[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] la .alis.



On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Christopher Doty <suomichris@gmail.com> wrote:
Wow, I guess I completely missed the point of this conversation and what Michael was saying--which seems to be that he's going to do this however he wants, never mind what anyone says, instead of trying to actually think about this and present a solution that could be adopted by people in the future.  Is that a correct assessment?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 13:03, Michael Everson <michael.everson@gmail.com> wrote:
Noooooooo, that's *orthography*.

I tried not to get involved in this, but....  I'm not sure why you're drawing the line here, and saying that "G/a" is orthography and other things, like capitalization, not.  As far as I am concerned, Lojban orthography/typography/typesetting conventions/etc. are basically half done--the actual spelling of individual words is there, but the clause/sentence/paragraph/quotation stuff is missing.
 
Orthography and typography are not the same thing. Check the definitions. I posted them in this list a few missives ago.
 

Chris 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.