[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] la .alis.



Sorry to ask this again, you've been having to reply to a lot of people very quickly Michael, but I really want to know the answer.  What is your purpose in publishing this book?  If your purpose is to publish a lojban book for speakers of the language to buy/enjoy then why would you want to change the way that audience reads the language?  I just don't understand what you gain to benefit from it.  It seems a little type-o-centric to say "it uses latin characters, therefore, for some reasons or other, it should use the same typographic standards".  

I don't see how publishing it in a way that makes the target audience "groan every time [they] pick it up" benefits anybody in any way.  So please, why do you want to do this thing?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Michael Everson <michael.everson@gmail.com> wrote:
On 29 Mar 2010, at 19:09, Jonathan Jones wrote:

> Insofar as Lojban is concerned, {la.mari,án.} and {la.mari,An.} are the same thing. {la.mari,An.} is much more common, as "A" is easier to type. (On standard U.S. keyboard, for instance, "A" is <shift>+a, "á" is <alt>+<numpad 0,2,2,5>.)

That would be pretty old software. US International keyboards have shipped on the Windows platform for a very long time indeed. I use an Irish keyboard on the Mac OS, and for me, A is shift-a, and á is alt-a, The US keyboard on the Mac has alt-e + a for á. And has for years and years.

>> and some people use guillemets,
>
> I've never seen that used in actual writing.

Yes, well, I'm going to use them, and they're discussed on p. 67 of Nick and John's book.

>> and some people use question marks and exclamation marks.
>
> I've never seen that used in actual writing.

They're discussed on p. 67 of Nick and John's book.

>> At least that's what people are saying.
>
> No, people are saying they *can* be. Not that they *are*.

Well, fine. Then I *can* use them. :-)

>> But those are variations of Latin typographic conventions used to write the language.
>
> Those are non-standard conventions, yes.

They're discussed on p. 67 of Nick and John's book.

Michael

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.