Re: [lojban] la .alis.

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Michael Everson <michael.everson@gmail.com> wrote:

On 30 Mar 2010, at 19:17, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> This may not have been your intention, but so we're clear: the thing on the left is not how I write Lojban for publication; it needs dots.  If your intention was to show two forms that you find OK, then nevermind, but if your intention was to compare normal Lojban orthography to your version, you've erected a straw man.

I always find mentions of straw men unconvincing.

The text on the left is based on the source text as I have it, which has no dots.

Is there a version with dots?

 

Probably not, but there should be. (There should also not be, IMO, a version *without* them.)

Michael

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.