Re: [lojban] World-historical and religious figures in Lojban

["Mark E. Shoulson" <mark@kli.org>]

>Organization: Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science
>From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@MATH.BAS.BG>
>Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:29:23 +0300
>
>Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
>> >From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@MATH.BAS.BG>
>> >Pierre Abbat wrote:
>> >> but how would you Lojbanize names like Tlaxcala?
>> >
>> >Perhaps {tackalad.}, since Nahuatl _tl_ is from _t_ that became
>> >lateralised in certain positions?  Or {.ytlackalad.}, applying
>> >the tried Arabic method of handling initial consonant clusters?
>> 
>> *baps Ivan on the head with a rolled-up ju'i lobypli*
>> 
>> Watch your {la} in cmene!!
>
>A JL is nothing; what I'm feeling like banging myself on the head with
>for rising to the bait in the first place would be nothing less than a
>rolled-up Woldemar Codex.  I knew that there was yet another reason
>for my profound aversion to cmene; thanks for reminding me what it is.
>
>Make mine {la'o ny. Tlaxcala ny.}; I'll have nothing else.
>And while we're at it, may I seize this opportunity to appeal
>to the person who will launch the next logical language project
>(if he is reading this now, which is likely if history is any
>guide) to please try to avoid committing the egregious error
>of choosing a sound sequence that is very common across nearly
>all human languages (Japanese, Maori and Nootka being in a tight
>minority) for a tag that can't appear inside cmene?  Surely if
>what is now {la} were, say, {jo'e}, the need to mutilate names
>so that they won't contain it would occur much less often.

I've said it before: we should probably just do away with *all* the
restrictions in cmene (except maybe for the illegal medials) at the cost of
requiring a pause after la/lai/doi.  It looks like we tried to make the
trade in one direction and it failed: nobody can remember the
restrictions.  It'd be easier to learn that the word {la} was pronounced
/la?/, with a glottal stop at the end (mutatis mutandis for lai and doi)
and leave it at that.

But it's too entrenched by now.

~mark