tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> > I don't see why tu'o would be any stronger than le/lo pa.
>
> Because tu'o is uninformative, it serves to indicate that the
> quantification is a redundant irrelevance. Or so the idea goes.



Why does tu'o mean 1 more than it means 0?




-----
We do not like                                       And if a cat
those Rs and Ds,                                     needed a hat?
Who can't resist                                     Free enterprise
more subsidies.                                      is there for that!