Re: [lojban] Re: (C)V'{i|u}V

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit:

> Because "ci,e" can be pronounced as "ci'e", audiovisual isomorphism 
> requires that it be equivalent to same for purposes of morphology.  

Not at all.  It merely requires that it be equivalent in all valid
words.  The word "ci,e" (as opposed to the string of letters "ci,e")
does not exist, and need not be equivalent to any word.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter