[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a

To: And Rosta <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:32:02 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCEIEEIAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com> from And Rosta at "Aug 6, 2001 11:16:32 pm"

And Rosta scripsit:

> Since both a zi'o-counterpart and a zo'e-counterpart would make sense
> in mekso, there seems to be a need for a new PA to be a zo'e
> counterpart. 

That would be mo'ezo'e.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>

References:
- RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: (C)V'{i|u}V
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] {kai'i}
Previous by thread: RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
Next by thread: RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread