[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > Since both a zi'o-counterpart and a zo'e-counterpart would make sense
> > in mekso, there seems to be a need for a new PA to be a zo'e
> > counterpart. 
> 
> That would be mo'ezo'e.

Oh, yes. 

       no'o = mo'e zu'i
       ???? = mo'e zo'e
       ???? = mo'e zi'o
       tu'o = mo'e ????

--And.