[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a

To: And Rosta <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:49:02 -0400
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEPHEIAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607

And Rosta wrote:

       no'o = mo'e zu'i
       ???? = mo'e zo'e
       ???? = mo'e zi'o
       tu'o = mo'e ????


tu'o is mo'e zi'o, IMHO.

--
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

References:
- RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] New to lojban, any suggestions?
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
Previous by thread: RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] vliju'a
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread