Re: [lojban] New to lojban, any suggestions?

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Robin Lee Powell wrote:


> > Or consider FreePC.  Or consider GNUPC.
>
> Never heard of them.  What are they?


Pascal compilers.  FreePC (www.freepascal.org) specializes in Borland
Pascal compatibility for i386 and 680x0 architectures; GNU PC
(http://agnes.dida.physik.uni-essen.de/~gnu-pascal/) works over a larger
range of Pascals and machines.


> Besides, I'm not just talking about Linux users.
>
> I'm also talking about Win2k and NT users (whom I'm fairly certain won't
> be able to run it, but I haven't tested)


I routinely run DOS programs on Windows NT, including graphic ones.
I can't see LogFlash as a problem: it is a very vanilla program from
the viewpoint of system services.

> and Mac users.


If GNU C can produce executables for a platform, so can GNU Pascal.

--
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein